Kaimosi Friends University Repository

Valorization of diatomaceous earth as an alternative activator for pumice–based geopolymer concrete: Experimental and multiple linear regression modeling

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wafula, Dorothy
dc.contributor.author Shikuku, Victor
dc.contributor.author Saouma, Felix
dc.contributor.author Tome, Sylvain
dc.date.accessioned 2026-09-02T07:11:54Z
dc.date.available 2026-09-02T07:11:54Z
dc.date.issued 2026
dc.identifier.citation [1] A. B˘ arbulescu, K. Hosen, Cement industry pollution and its impact on the environment and population health: a review, Toxics 13 (2025) 587, https://doi. org/10.3390/toxics13070587. [2] K. Kaptan, S. Cunha, J. Aguiar, A review: construction and demolition waste as a novel source for CO2 reduction in portland cement production for concrete, Sustainability 16 (2024) 585, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020585. [3] L.K. Turner, F.G. Collins, Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 43 (2013) 125–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023. [4] A. Mellado, C. Catalan, ´ N. Bouzon, ´ M.V. Borrachero, J.M. Monzo, ´ J. Paya, ´ Carbon footprint of geopolymeric mortar: study of the contribution of the alkaline activating solution and assessment of an alternative route, RSC Adv. 4 (2014) 23846–23852, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03375B. [5] Z. Ahmadi, J. Esmaeili, J. Kasaei, R. Hajialioghli, Properties of sustainable cement mortars containing high volume of raw diatomite, Sustain. Mater. Technol. 16 (2018) 47–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2018.05.001. [6] S. Jemutai-Kimosop, F. Orata, V.O. Shikuku, V.A. Okello, Z.M. Getenga, Insights on adsorption of carbamazepine onto iron oxide modified diatomaceous earth: Kinetics, isotherms, thermodynamics, and mechanisms, Environ. Res. 180 (2020) 108898, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108898. [7] P. Liu, Z. Yu, F. Guo, Y. Chen, P. Sun, Temperature response in concrete under natural environment, Constr. Build. Mater. 98 (2015) 713–721, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.070. [8] M. Sarıdemir, S. Çelikten, A. Yıldırım, Mechanical and microstructural properties of calcined diatomite powder modified high strength mortars at ambient and high temperatures, Adv. Powder Technol. 31 (2020) 3004–3017, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apt.2020.05.024. [9] S. Liao, H. Xu, L. Wu, Z. Zhao, K. Ma, Strength formation mechanism and microstructural evolution of low-grade diatomite-based cementitious materials, Constr. Build. Mater. 431 (2024) 136588, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2024.136588. [10] A. Font, L. Soriano, L. Reig, M.M. Tashima, M.V. Borrachero, J. Monzo, ´ J. Pay´ a, Use of residual diatomaceous earth as a silica source in geopolymer production, Mater. Lett. 223 (2018) 10–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.04.010. [11] S. Leon-Guti ´ ´errez, P. Delgado-Plana, M.A. Gomez-Casero, ´ D. Eliche-Quesada, Development of one-part alkali-activated cements using biomass bottom ash and brick dust powder with a sustainable activator derived from spent diatomaceous earth, J. Build. Eng. 128 (2026) 116557, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jobe.2026.116557. [12] M. Verma, N. Dev, Effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash ratio and the curing conditions on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete, Struct. Concr. 23 (2022) 2015–2029, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000536. [13] A. Albidah, M. Alghannam, H. Abbas, T. Almusallam, Y. Al-Salloum, Characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete for different mix design parameters, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 10 (2021) 84–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmrt.2020.11.104. [14] G. Sua-iam, B. Chatveera, A study on workability and mechanical properties of eco sustainable self-compacting concrete incorporating PCB waste and fly ash, J. Clean. Prod. 329 (2021) 129523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129523. [15] Z. Safari, R. Kurda, B. Al-Hadad, F. Mahmood, M. Tapan, Mechanical characteristics of pumice-based geopolymer paste, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 162 (2020) 105055, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105055. [16] M.A. Hamid, N. Yaltay, M. Türkmenoglu, ˘ Properties of pumice-fly ash based geopolymer paste, Constr. Build. Mater. 316 (2022) 125665, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125665. [17] A.M. Zeyad, H.M. Magbool, B.A. Tayeh, A.R. Garcez De Azevedo, A. Abutaleb, Q. Hussain, Production of geopolymer concrete by utilizing volcanic pumice dust, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 16 (2022) e00802, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cscm.2021.e00802. [18] K. Felaous, A. Aziz, M. Achab, Physico-mechanical and durability properties of new eco-material based on blast furnace slag activated by Moroccan diatomite gel, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 (2023) 3549–3561, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 022-22461-7. [19] O. Cavdar, H. Temizer, The regression analysis and determination of mechanical and physical properties on geopolymer composites under thermal and water curing, Therm. Sci. 29 (2025) 4487–4502, https://doi.org/10.2298/ TSCI250216091C. [20] Eshwarayya Bolluru Lokesha, Mangalpady Aruna, Sandi Kumar Reddy, Anil Sagar Srinivasa, Development of Regression Model and Optimization of Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete Prepared Using Gold Ore Tailings, J. Hazard. Toxic. Radioact. Waste 27 (2023) 04023033, https://doi.org/10.1061/ JHTRBP.HZENG-1259. [21] R. Churata, J. Almiron, ´ M. Vargas, D. Tupayachy-Quispe, J. Torres-Almiron, ´ Y. Ortiz-Valdivia, F. Velasco, Study of geopolymer composites based on volcanic ash, fly ash, pozzolan, metakaolin and mining tailing, Buildings 12 (2022) 1118, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081118. [22] P. Vassileva, G. Gentscheva, E. Ivanova, P. Tzvetkova, D. Voykova, M. Apostolova, CHARACTERIZATION OF NATURAL DIATOMITES FROM BULGARIA, (n.d.). [23] A. Touina, S. Chernai, B. Mansour, H. Hadjar, A. Ouakouak, B. Hamdi, Characterization and efficient dye discoloration of Algerian diatomite from Ouled Djilali-Mostaganem, SN Appl. Sci. 3 (2021) 476, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452- 021-04334-9. [24] S.K. Nath, S. Kumar, Role of particle fineness on engineering properties and microstructure of fly ash derived geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater. 233 (2020) 117294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117294. [25] C. Karaaslan, E. Yener, M. Demirel, A. Nis¸, Sustainable geopolymer synthesis from calcined pumice: reactivity, mechanical performance, and water resistance, Sustainability 18 (2026) 2685, https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062685. [26] J.N.Y. Djobo, S. Tome, Insights into alkali and acid-activated volcanic ash-based materials: A review, Cem. Concr. Compos. 152 (2024) 105660, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105660. [27] P. Duxson, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, J.S.J. Van Deventer, The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 37 (2007) 1590–1597, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018. [28] M. S, R. J, N.P. Rajamane, R. Jose, Thermal and structural micro analysis of micro silica blended fly ash based geopolymer composites, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 499 (2018) 117–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.07.027. [29] J.L. Provis, C.Z. Yong, P. Duxson, J.S.J. Van Deventer, Correlating mechanical and thermal properties of sodium silicate-fly ash geopolymers, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 336 (2009) 57–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. colsurfa.2008.11.019. [30] S.A. Bernal, J.L. Provis, V. Rose, R. Mejía De Gutierrez, Evolution of binder structure in sodium silicate-activated slag-metakaolin blends, Cem. Concr. Compos. 33 (2011) 46–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.004. [31] K. Yomthong, D. Wattanasiriwech, P. Aungkavattana, S. Wattanasiriwech, Effect of NaOH Concentration and Curing Regimes on Compressive Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer, Mater. Today. Proc. 43 (2021) 2647–2654, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.630. [32] G.V.P. Bhagath Singh, K.V.L. Subramaniam, Evaluation of sodium content and sodium hydroxide molarity on compressive strength of alkali activated low calcium fly ash, Cem. Concr. Compos. 81 (2017) 122–132, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.001. [33] A.A. Aliabdo, A.E.M. Abd Elmoaty, H.A. Salem, Effect of water addition, plasticizer and alkaline solution constitution on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance, Constr. Build. Mater. 121 (2016) 694–703, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.conbuildmat.2016.06.062. [34] P. Sajan, T. Jiang, C. Lau, G. Tan, K. Ng, Combined effect of curing temperature, curing period and alkaline concentration on the mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer, Clean. Mater. 1 (2021) 100002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clema.2021.100002. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://erepository.kafuco.ac.ke/123456789/376
dc.description.abstract Geopolymer cement (GC) is gaining attention as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement due to its lower CO₂ emissions. However, GC formations rely on sodium silicate, which is expensive, and its production has a high carbon footprint. The development of alternative silica and aluminosilicate sources is therefore critical for improving the sustainability and economic viability of geopolymer concrete. This study focuses on the use of diatomaceous earth (DE) as an alternative silica source and examines the effect of the activator composition on the compressive strength of pumice-based geopolymer concrete, relative to commercial sodium silicate (CSS) as a control, using a one-step synthesis approach. The study evaluates the effects of curing temperature (30, 50, and 70 ◦C), sodium hydroxide concentration (6, 8, and 10 M), and silica mass in the activator (40, 80, and 100 g) on the compressive strength of the resulting geopolymer concrete. The compressive strengths for CSS and DE samples were comparable (<6%). The Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model (y = 0.3319[NaOH]-0.0231 [DE]+0.0304[Temp]+0.4508) indicated that NaOH has the highest positive effect on compressive strength, while excessive silica content has a negative effect on the compressive strength of pumice-based geopolymer concrete. Compressive strength increased (~50%) from 2.8 to 4.41 MPa when NaOH concentration increased from 6 M to 10 M for DE samples, respectively. In contrast, an increase in silica mass from 40 g to 100 g reduced the strength by ~28.9% and ~38% for CSS and DE samples, respectively. The results indicate that at high NaOH concentration, low DE content and elevated temperatures, DE-based activator produced an activator with comparable results to CSS. In the absence of established geopolymer concrete standards in Kenya, a laboratory scale mix design was adopted to enable consistent comparison between DE and CSS based systems. Further research should focus on mix optimization and strategies to enhance strength development for broader construction applications and standardization. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Diatomaceous earth Alternative activator Geopolymer concrete Multiple linear regression en_US
dc.title Valorization of diatomaceous earth as an alternative activator for pumice–based geopolymer concrete: Experimental and multiple linear regression modeling en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Erepository


Browse

My Account