Abstract:
Internal control systems in SACCOs have been implemented as one of the key
measures necessary for promoting a healthy business environment by mitigating
risks that arise with credit creation. Despite implementing internal control systems,
credit risk is still an issue in these SACCOs. This study’s key objective was to
determine the effect of internal control systems on credit risk of deposit-taking
SACCOs in Western Kenya. Specific objectives were; to assess the effect of control
environment on credit risk of deposit-taking SACCOs in Western Kenya, to
establish the effect of control activities on credit risk of deposit-taking SACCOs in
Western Kenya, to evaluate the effect of risk assessment on credit risk of deposit taking SACCOs in Western Kenya and to examine the effect of monitoring on credit
risk of deposit- taking SACCOs in Western Kenya. The study was guided by agency,
contingency, and modern portfolio theories. The target population consisted of 212
respondents from the seven registered deposit-taking SACCOs. In this study, a
descriptive research design was used. The sample size was obtained through simple
random sampling. Both primary and secondary data were used. Primary data was
collected using questionnaires, while secondary data was obtained from audited
financial statements of the SACCOs using a secondary data collection sheet. Data
were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Statistics were
generated using both descriptive and inferential methods. Descriptive data included;
frequencies and percentages. Diagnostic tests comprised; normality,
autocorrelation, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity. Inferential statistics
contained correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, and ANOVA. The
diagnostic tests conducted conformed with the linear regression requirements. The
independent variables of the study were negatively correlated, with Control
Activities having a correlation coefficient of -0.517, Risk Assessment with -0.763
and Monitoring with -0.635. The regression model showed an R-squared of 0.612
while ANOVA had an F-statistic of 3.132 with a p-value of 0.007 which was greater
than 0.005.The findings of the regression analysis revealed that control environment
had a β of -0.089 with a p-value of 0.124, control activities had a coefficient of -
0.191 with a p-value of 0.011, risk assessment had a β value of -0.225 and a p-value
of 0.007 while monitoring had a β value of -0.217 and a p-value of 0.001. Control
activities, Risk assessment, and Monitoring had a significant negative relationship
with credit risk, but the control environment had an insignificant relationship with
credit risk. It was recommended that SACCOs review their policies and procedures
regularly to meet the current market trends. Internal and external audits should be
reviewed to check on variances and appropriate measures to deal with them. Credit
monitoring should be done to guarantee that loans are repaid on time and issued to
credit-worthy individuals.